observability.fyi

Grafana Mimir vs Elasticsearch (ELK)

A detailed comparison of two leading observability platforms.

Gr

Grafana Mimir

Scalable long-term storage for Prometheus

8.7/10
El

Elasticsearch (ELK)

Distributed search and analytics engine

8.8/10
Overview

Who is each tool for?

Gr

Grafana Mimir

Teams needing horizontally scalable Prometheus storage

El

Elasticsearch (ELK)

Organizations needing powerful full-text search and log analytics

Analysis

Pros and Cons

Gr

Grafana Mimir

Pros

  • Unlimited horizontal scalability
  • 100% PromQL compatible
  • Multi-tenant architecture
  • Cost-effective long-term storage

Cons

  • Complex to self-host at scale
  • Requires Kubernetes expertise
  • Steeper learning curve than SaaS options
Full review
El

Elasticsearch (ELK)

Pros

  • Powerful full-text search
  • Highly scalable architecture
  • Rich ecosystem (ELK Stack)
  • Flexible schema and queries

Cons

  • Resource-intensive operation
  • Complex cluster management
  • Licensing changes caused concerns
Full review
Ratings

Feature Comparison

Feature
Gr
Grafana Mimir
El
Elasticsearch (ELK)
APM
4
6
Log Management
3
9.5
Infrastructure Monitoring
9
7.5
Alerting
8
7.5
Integrations
8.5
8.5
Ease of Use
6.5
6.5
Support
7.5
8
Value for Money
9.5
8
Overall Score
8.7
8.8
Investment

Pricing

Gr

Grafana Mimir

Free / Cloud from $49/mo

Pricing varies by data volume and features. Contact Grafana Mimir for a custom quote.

El

Elasticsearch (ELK)

Free / Cloud from $95/mo

Pricing varies by data volume and features. Contact Elasticsearch (ELK) for a custom quote.

Conclusion

Our Verdict

Both Grafana Mimir and Elasticsearch (ELK) are excellent observability platforms. Elasticsearch (ELK) edges ahead with a score of 8.8/10, particularly excelling in APM and Log Management.