observability.fyi

Checkly vs Grafana Mimir

A detailed comparison of two leading observability platforms.

Ch

Checkly

Monitoring as code for modern DevOps

8.8/10
Gr

Grafana Mimir

Scalable long-term storage for Prometheus

8.7/10
Overview

Who is each tool for?

Ch

Checkly

DevOps teams wanting programmable synthetic monitoring

Gr

Grafana Mimir

Teams needing horizontally scalable Prometheus storage

Analysis

Pros and Cons

Ch

Checkly

Pros

  • Playwright/Puppeteer native support
  • Monitoring as code approach
  • Excellent CI/CD integration
  • Modern developer experience

Cons

  • Requires coding knowledge
  • Smaller check location network
  • Newer platform, smaller community
Full review
Gr

Grafana Mimir

Pros

  • Unlimited horizontal scalability
  • 100% PromQL compatible
  • Multi-tenant architecture
  • Cost-effective long-term storage

Cons

  • Complex to self-host at scale
  • Requires Kubernetes expertise
  • Steeper learning curve than SaaS options
Full review
Ratings

Feature Comparison

Feature
Ch
Checkly
Gr
Grafana Mimir
APM
5
4
Log Management
4
3
Infrastructure Monitoring
5
9
Alerting
8.5
8
Integrations
9
8.5
Ease of Use
8
6.5
Support
8
7.5
Value for Money
8.5
9.5
Overall Score
8.8
8.7
Investment

Pricing

Ch

Checkly

Free / Team from $30/mo

Pricing varies by data volume and features. Contact Checkly for a custom quote.

Gr

Grafana Mimir

Free / Cloud from $49/mo

Pricing varies by data volume and features. Contact Grafana Mimir for a custom quote.

Conclusion

Our Verdict

Both Checkly and Grafana Mimir are excellent observability platforms. Checkly edges ahead with a score of 8.8/10, particularly excelling in APM and Log Management.