observability.fyi

Pingdom vs Checkly

A detailed comparison of two leading observability platforms.

Pi

Pingdom

Website performance and uptime monitoring

8.5/10
Ch

Checkly

Monitoring as code for modern DevOps

8.8/10
Overview

Who is each tool for?

Pi

Pingdom

Teams needing reliable uptime monitoring with RUM

Ch

Checkly

DevOps teams wanting programmable synthetic monitoring

Analysis

Pros and Cons

Pi

Pingdom

Pros

  • Reliable and established service
  • Real user monitoring included
  • Transaction monitoring
  • Detailed performance reports

Cons

  • Can get expensive with more checks
  • UI feels dated
  • Limited API capabilities
Full review
Ch

Checkly

Pros

  • Playwright/Puppeteer native support
  • Monitoring as code approach
  • Excellent CI/CD integration
  • Modern developer experience

Cons

  • Requires coding knowledge
  • Smaller check location network
  • Newer platform, smaller community
Full review
Ratings

Feature Comparison

Feature
Pi
Pingdom
Ch
Checkly
APM
4
5
Log Management
3
4
Infrastructure Monitoring
6
5
Alerting
8.5
8.5
Integrations
7.5
9
Ease of Use
8.5
8
Support
8
8
Value for Money
7.5
8.5
Overall Score
8.5
8.8
Investment

Pricing

Pi

Pingdom

From $15/mo

Pricing varies by data volume and features. Contact Pingdom for a custom quote.

Ch

Checkly

Free / Team from $30/mo

Pricing varies by data volume and features. Contact Checkly for a custom quote.

Conclusion

Our Verdict

Both Pingdom and Checkly are excellent observability platforms. Checkly edges ahead with a score of 8.8/10, particularly excelling in APM and Log Management.