observability.fyi

Grafana Loki vs Datadog Metrics

A detailed comparison of two leading observability platforms.

Gr

Grafana Loki

Like Prometheus, but for logs

8.5/10
Da

Datadog Metrics

Cloud-scale metrics monitoring

9.2/10
Overview

Who is each tool for?

Gr

Grafana Loki

Teams wanting cost-effective log aggregation with Grafana

Da

Datadog Metrics

Enterprises needing scalable metrics with extensive integrations

Analysis

Pros and Cons

Gr

Grafana Loki

Pros

  • Cost-effective (indexes labels only)
  • Native Grafana integration
  • Prometheus-like label system
  • Easy to operate

Cons

  • No full-text indexing
  • Query performance depends on labels
  • Less powerful search than Elasticsearch
Full review
Da

Datadog Metrics

Pros

  • 700+ out-of-box integrations
  • Powerful anomaly detection
  • Excellent visualization options
  • Seamless cloud provider integration

Cons

  • Can become expensive at scale
  • Custom metrics pricing adds up
  • Vendor lock-in concerns
Full review
Ratings

Feature Comparison

Feature
Gr
Grafana Loki
Da
Datadog Metrics
APM
4
7
Log Management
8.5
6
Infrastructure Monitoring
7
9.5
Alerting
7.5
9
Integrations
8
10
Ease of Use
8
8.5
Support
7.5
8.5
Value for Money
9.5
7.5
Overall Score
8.5
9.2
Investment

Pricing

Gr

Grafana Loki

Free / Cloud from $49/mo

Pricing varies by data volume and features. Contact Grafana Loki for a custom quote.

Da

Datadog Metrics

From $15/host/mo

Pricing varies by data volume and features. Contact Datadog Metrics for a custom quote.

Conclusion

Our Verdict

Both Grafana Loki and Datadog Metrics are excellent observability platforms. Datadog Metrics edges ahead with a score of 9.2/10, particularly excelling in APM and Infrastructure Monitoring.