observability.fyi

Grafana Mimir vs Datadog Metrics

A detailed comparison of two leading observability platforms.

Gr

Grafana Mimir

Scalable long-term storage for Prometheus

8.7/10
Da

Datadog Metrics

Cloud-scale metrics monitoring

9.2/10
Overview

Who is each tool for?

Gr

Grafana Mimir

Teams needing horizontally scalable Prometheus storage

Da

Datadog Metrics

Enterprises needing scalable metrics with extensive integrations

Analysis

Pros and Cons

Gr

Grafana Mimir

Pros

  • Unlimited horizontal scalability
  • 100% PromQL compatible
  • Multi-tenant architecture
  • Cost-effective long-term storage

Cons

  • Complex to self-host at scale
  • Requires Kubernetes expertise
  • Steeper learning curve than SaaS options
Full review
Da

Datadog Metrics

Pros

  • 700+ out-of-box integrations
  • Powerful anomaly detection
  • Excellent visualization options
  • Seamless cloud provider integration

Cons

  • Can become expensive at scale
  • Custom metrics pricing adds up
  • Vendor lock-in concerns
Full review
Ratings

Feature Comparison

Feature
Gr
Grafana Mimir
Da
Datadog Metrics
APM
4
7
Log Management
3
6
Infrastructure Monitoring
9
9.5
Alerting
8
9
Integrations
8.5
10
Ease of Use
6.5
8.5
Support
7.5
8.5
Value for Money
9.5
7.5
Overall Score
8.7
9.2
Investment

Pricing

Gr

Grafana Mimir

Free / Cloud from $49/mo

Pricing varies by data volume and features. Contact Grafana Mimir for a custom quote.

Da

Datadog Metrics

From $15/host/mo

Pricing varies by data volume and features. Contact Datadog Metrics for a custom quote.

Conclusion

Our Verdict

Both Grafana Mimir and Datadog Metrics are excellent observability platforms. Datadog Metrics edges ahead with a score of 9.2/10, particularly excelling in APM and Log Management.